Re: AFW Meeting!

by Cirno Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:09 am

Please don't turn AFW in some kind of country and that certain people act like they govern that country.

Barack--Kelsea had a dream. It started with certain old members being granted veteran statusses so newcoming members could go to them for advise.

Now we have....

Harry Osborns everywhere.

by Bluemouse Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:28 am

Pipe down, Harry.

by Cirno Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:49 am

:< I am not a Harry.

by Bluemouse Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:56 am

by beangraff Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:02 am

[quote="Bluemouse":qzvuu3h2][quote="daemongirl":qzvuu3h2]Upper card will mean different things to different people, but also we are speaking more about the group as a whole and less about you <img src=

" title="Razz" /> No one is mad at you Blue, we love you, come get a hug!

Oh, shut up. I wouldn't care if you WERE mad SPECIFICALLY at me. What I'm driving at here, is WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PEOPLE ON ABOUT.

Nebulous, half-baked ideas about oppression and rebellion are dangerous and stupid. Moreover they make one annoying and unpopular at dinner parties. If you can't defend this new soap box of yours, then shut up and go back under the porch.

by daemongirl Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:22 am

[quote="Bluemouse":1y3ls95x][quote="daemongirl":1y3ls95x]Upper card will mean different things to different people, but also we are speaking more about the group as a whole and less about you <img src=

" title="Razz" /> No one is mad at you Blue, we love you, come get a hug!

Oh, shut up. I wouldn't care if you WERE mad SPECIFICALLY at me. What I'm driving at here, is WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PEOPLE ON ABOUT.

Nebulous, half-baked ideas about oppression and rebellion are dangerous and stupid. Moreover they make one annoying and unpopular at dinner parties. If you can't defend this new soap box of yours, then shut up and go back under the porch.

by Bluemouse Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:01 am

Oi.

Have you ever heard anyone use the words "Oh, shut up" in a context other than a violent attempt to destroy a person? I understand that it's the internet and you don't know me, but at least give me a teensy little bit of credit.

I reaaaally didn't ask you to explain how you thought I was trying to maul you like a bear, I just wanted you to clarify what you were talking about because to me it was very unclear. There are a lot of terms going around now devised to divide people into groups on this site, and I think none of us are quite clear on the criteria.

I'd prefer that this site, the parts of it that make it more than a hub for IM matches, not dissolve. Classism doesn't help that. Also, I'll apologize for being indelicate, and I do try to be more gentle, at least with the internet community, but don't be afraid. You're safe as long as you don't try to stick your fingers inside the cage.

by daemongirl Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:04 am

Its likely cause I don't know you well that I looked at those words as being worse than they were.

If theres a particular point you would like clarified pm me, i presented quite a few thoughts and explaining each in detail here, would take forever.

by Bluemouse Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:05 am

Don't be obtuse, I asked you about one.

I guess that line isn't so important, though, I'd rather not inflate it into something it isn't.

by daemongirl Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:12 am

Hmm, if you meant about how I define upper card I can explain that. To be honest I am not sure which characters are included in that as it was a term told to me by someone I would consider a veteran when they told me my characters did not belong in matches with them, but to me its really established characters such as who is in the top ten, has a title, or in general is considered by many to be especially popular. The issues Tai brought up for example I think were aimed at a few specific people from that group, and not at the group as a whole.

by Sponsored content