Re: Topic: Wrestling?

by TiefBlau Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:21 pm

[quote="Old_Man_Tai":213i7v4i]I'm giving Cena credit because he actually is branching out and trying new things with his style and move set, something most of the lower roster already does, that he hasn't done in about 10 years. The point is that he's been trying and his recent matches have been better for it. If Orton did that, maybe his matches would be more entertaining.

I've always found "Sloppy" to be an underwhelming criticism. Mainly because every wrestler on the roster can, and has, been sloppy at times. Even your favorite, Mr. Jeff Hardy, has been sloppy as hell in his matches, and that's one thing you can't just brush away like all his other past issues. Doesn't stop him from putting on good matches, and it hasn't stopped The Wyatts either.

@Gregar: WWE is still entertaining and there's been some good things lately. The Shield/Rhodes fued for one starters. I'd even say The Shield has been the best thing WWE has done in years. It's still entertaining and there's still good matches, but it's hard to see that when just about every "smark" on the internet is a whiny self entitled bitch that thinks everything before and after the years of 1997-2000 sucked and refuses to like anything WWE does unless it involves The Attitude Era.

You CANT give someone credit for FINALLY doing a simple move when there are wrestlers that innovate every single fucking time they go out to the ring. It's absolutely pathetic to give him credit for that. That puts so many people to shame and I think it's wrong to do that. Cena is Cena, I'm not putting him under for it, he was probably the second best match at SS, though that's not saying much.

As for all t hat, Jeff Has had sloppy matches, i'll totally agree. And those matches sucked. That tag team match, im sorry to tell you, sucked. If they can maybe one day put on a good match, I'll give them credit, but sorry, they did NOT put on a good match at SS, that's that.

WWE is losing entertainment value week by week and it's sad. the AE wasn't even a good era, but this is worse.

by **Old_Man_Tai** Wed Nov 27, 2013 3:06 am

We agree to disagree then, as with everything else we talk about.

by Bluemouse Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:28 am

I DON'T AGREE TO THAT! YOU'RE BOTH WRONG AND DUMB!

by FlameofHope Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:26 am

I was really hoping that they were going dual title match and not a unifier, but considering how many times Michael Cole has said Unified during this Raw I'm pretty sure its the latter >_<

by **Old_Man_Tai** Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:23 am

I am really tired of Cena telling EVERY FREAKING OPPONENT he has in a title match, even the ones where he ISN'T the champion, that they haven't earned their title. Apparently according to John Cena, NOBODY in the ENTIRE FUCKING WWE has earned the title except for John Cena and John Cena only.

Fuck that.

by Tatyina Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:34 am

Its because they can't earn the title until John Cena beats them and ends the feud. But then John Cena won and ended the feud so he earned it, not them.

by Bluemouse Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:39 am

John Cena should find a new job.

by kerflubble Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:34 am

by Harrier Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:05 pm

WWE is probably out of believable bad guys to feed to Cena. So they have the same shit at hands they had seen at the end and the new rise of Hulkamania in WWE:
Hogan:
*Hulk Hogan blatantly digs at Miss Elizabeth. Savage is upset, and rightfully so. Hogan is as much a dick as you can be as a face.
*Hogan betrays Sid Justice for his victory for Royal Rumble. Sid totally in the right, Hogan an insecure asshole all the way in this feud.
*Arrive late, win the belt after Yokozuna had won the belt from a hard fighting Hart, leave.

Cena:
*Cena rises above hate against Kane, throws Ryder under the bus.
*Tries to steal Rybacks glory, despite being best buddies never appears to help Ryback against the Shield.
*Arrive late, win the belt from Rey Mysterio after Rey had a match an hour ago, leave.

The only difference between these two guys is that the people loved Hogan and his promos were always better than Cena promos. So Cena is and always will be inferior to Hogan, but the way they got booked was absolutely the same at some time. That Vinnie Mac love for insecure top guys!

by **Old_Man_Tai** Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:27 pm

Does WWE actually think that having Cena or Orton hold both titles is going to increase ratings or buy rates? The people that watch to see them will still watch, but all the people who are sick of seeing those two as the main event title holders will just be even more turned off that one of them is now the "Unified Champion" (WHY!? Seriously, "Undisputed Champion" was FINE, Why change it to something stupid!?)

by Sponsored content