Topic: Wrestling?

I'm confused, is the stipulation that if Undertaker loses it's his last Wrestlemania, or his last WWE appearance?

And is it just me, or is the smarky crowd making this Raw already seem pretty damn good...

scorn53 wrote:I'm confused, is the stipulation that if Undertaker loses it's his last Wrestlemania, or his last WWE appearance?

It's not 100% clear...

Know what else isnt 100% clear?

If Shane actually connected with the Undertaker just now. It looked like a miss. Still cool to see him go coast to coast though.

Shane diving off the top turnbuckle was the only thing good about raw so far.

He totally whiffed, but it's still awesome.

I don't want Shane to win cause that will mean no more Undertaker. I don't want Taker to win cause that will mean more of the Authority. So who am I supposed to root for again?

But wait...If Taker loses, and he's forced to retire, can't Shane just hire him back since he'll be in charge of RAW? Seems like a good idea if his whole schtick is doing what's best for WWE...

I don't understand these stipulations, is what I'm trying to say.

I don't understand why Shane is supposed to be a draw in The Year of our Lord 2016 when he hasn't been on TV in...what, ten years? Eight years?

What a complete waste of the Undertaker match. ~_~

All they said was that its Takers last Mania if he loses

Which means he can still wrestle in WWE any other time

It's because their backed in a corner. They tried a Taker heel turn and it didn't work, the crowd won't boo Taker. But, Shane is the babyface and they can't turn him heel, and retiring Taker would turn him heel. So they do the "No more Mania" thing so Shane doesn't become the heel of the match.


Really, this story was flawed as hell from the start. Shane coming back is cool, but he should never have been the opponent.

should have been vince vs shane.

Yes, lets put a 72 year old man in the ring just for the sake of a rematch from Wrestlemania X7

Alexandra wrote:I don't understand why Shane is supposed to be a draw in The Year of our Lord 2016 when he hasn't been on TV in...what, ten years? Eight years?

What a complete waste of the Undertaker match. ~_~

Yeah, Undertaker is the one wasting this year's Undertaker match. I'm so done with him. I know it's blasphemy, but he just really needs to go away.

Shane looks and sounds a lot better than Taker even with 8 years of ring rust.

I'm calling it right now: Vince enters the HIAC and turns on Taker, hitting with a chair so Shane can win after a top rope elbow drop.

Shane thus turns heel and joins the authority, because WWE cannot function without a heel GM